KKNK 2021: “Samsa-masjien.”

Deur: Willem Anker
Met: Gerben Kamper, Antoinette Kellermann, Illana Cilliers, Ludwig Binge
Regie, ontwerp, en vervaardiging: Jaco Bouwer
Klankbaan: Pierre-Henri Wicomb
Beligting: Wolf Britz
Kostuums: Birrie le Roux
Verfilm deur: Jaco Bouwer
Tydelik beskikbaar aanlyn
Julie 2021

“Samsa-masjien,” in die weergawe waarin dit by die KKNK se 2021 aanlynfees te sien is, is ‘n verfilming van die oorspronklike teaterproduksie wat in 2014 by die KKNK en die Baxterteater in Kaapstad opgevoer is. Tydens die KKNK se teatergesprek met die skrywer, Willem Anker, regisseur, Jaco Bouwer, en klankontwerper, Pierre-Henri Wicomb op 22 Julie vanjaar, het Bouwer verduidelik dat hy die teateropvoering verfilm het vir argiefdoeleindes. Dit is dus nie geskep met ‘n gehoor in gedagte nie. Tog, as gevolg van die beperking wat die pandemie op teater plaas, het die KKNK Bouwer oortuig om die verfilming vir ‘n bepaalde tydperk aan aanlyngehore beskikbaar te stel. ‘n Mens koop dus ‘n kaartjie en kan daarna die verfilming aflaai en kyk op ‘n tyd wat jou pas.

Die verfilmde weergawe van “Samsa-masjien” is ‘n voltooide produk en word nie lewendig aan die gehoor gewys, soos die geval met lewendige uitsendings of zoomproduksies is nie. Dít, tesame met die verskeie filmtegnieke wat Bouwer aanwend met die opname van die produksie, maak dat hierdie weergawe van “Samsa-masjien” ‘n hibriede film word, soos Izak de Vries tereg opmerk. Hierdie hibriede film is gevolglik meer kykbaar, en boet veral nie die estiese trefkrag in wat ‘n gehoor teen hierdie tyd van Bouwer se teaterwerk verwag nie. Mens kan boonop goed hoor en sien en indien die video buffer, mis jy nie ‘n paar sekondes van die produksie nie. Dit het my wel gepla dat ek nie kon kyk waar ek wou nie, veral in hierdie produksie waar die kelder en dit wat daardeur voorgestel word deurentyd aanwesig is, selfs (of miskien veral) wanneer die fokus elders is. Die sogenaamde plurisignation van teater word dus ingeboet. In plaas daarvan om op verskeie gelyktydige maniere met die gehoor te kommunikeer, lei die verfilming van “Samsa-masjien” die kyker se oog na bepaalde dinge. Hierdie is geensins kritiek op die verfilming nie. Trouens, ek dink nie daar is ‘n manier om teater op ‘n kykbare manier te verfilm sonder om plurisignation in te boet nie. Dit is bloot kommentaar op dít wat venue-gebasseerde teater ons kan bied wat aanlynteater nie kan nie.

“Samsa-masjien” beeld die metamorfose uit van Gregor Samsa (Gerben Kamper). Anders as in Kafka se oorspronklike verhaal, is Gregor in hierdie teks ‘n afgetrede biologie-onderwyser wat aan demensie ly. Gregor en sy vrou, Josefine (Antoinette Kellermann) se stelselmatige terugkeer na ‘n kinderlike toestand staan in skerp kontras met hul dogter (Illana Cilliers) en haar man (Ludwig Binge) se pogings om ‘n blink gepoleerde beeld na buite te vertoon. Hoewel Gregor en Josefine die donker kelder bo hul kinders se kliniese huis begin verkies, is hulle in hierdie ruimte geensins “veilig weggebêre” nie. Die keuse om Gregor se metamorfose toe te skryf aan demensie is meesterlik. Ek dink baie mense wat iemand met progressiewe demensie ken sou sê dat hierdie metamorfose selfs vreemder of meer ontstellend kan wees as om in ‘n insek te verander.

Die tema van reinheid versus besmetting wat reeds in die teks (en sekerlik ook in die teaterproduksie) baie effektief uitgebeeld word, neem ‘n nuwe gestalte aan in die huidige konteks. Waar dit tydens die skryf van die teks en die oorspronklike opvoering miskien iets in die agterkop van meeste mense was, is die idee van besmetting nou alomteenwoordig. Die stuk dekonstrueer die binêre opposisie tussen reinheid en besmetting baie effektief (iets waaroor ek verder sal uitwei op ‘n ander platform), maar tydens die pandemie word hierdie dekonstruksie meer vreesaanjaend. Dit is beslis nie iets wat jy tot die spreekwoordelike kelder kan verban nie.

Dit is verder wonderlik om ‘n teks te sien wat sulke ryk spelgeleenthede aan ouer akteurs bied. Daarbenewens is Kamper en Kellermann albei besondere akteurs. Hulle is vreesloos in elke opsig van woord. Hierdie akteurs word nie net tydens tonele met seks of naaktheid ontbloot nie, maar ook, byvoorbeeld, in Kellerman se woordelose trane in antwoord op haar dogter se sinnelose vraag aan die einde van die stuk.

Ek is baie dankbaar dat KKNK hierdie hibriede film aan gehore beskikbaar gestel het, veral aangesien ek nie in 2014 die teaterproduksie kon sien nie. Om ‘n toneelstuk aanlyn te sien kan nooit dieselfde wees as om dit in ‘n teater te sien nie. Dit maak dus sin om die medium van aanlynteater op ander maniere te probeer gebruik as om bloot teaterproduksies lewendig uit te saai. “Samsa-masjien” in hibriede filmvorm is sekerlik ‘n skaduwee van die destydse teaterproduksie, maar dit bly ‘n ryk kykervaring, veral in ‘n tyd wat meeste teaters se deure vir eers nog toe bly.

NAF 2021: “AnotherKind.”

By & With: Amy Louise Wilson, Aphiwe Livi, Francois Knoetze, Joanna Evans, Gugulethu Duma, Duduetsang Lamola (blk banaana), Iman Isaacs, Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi, Babalwa MakwetuBuhle Ngaba, Kathleen Stephens, Thembekile Komani, Phamela Manzi, Gomez Bakwene, Nicole Goto, Yusrah Bardien, Francis Burger, Zara Julius, KONJO
17 July 2021, 19:00
Online: Zoom

“AnotherKind” is described in the online NAF programme as “a funeral for a piece of theatre which never existed.” Instead of livestreaming or recording Amy Louise Wilson’s original play, “Another Kind of Dying,” the production team decided to tell the play’s story in a different way. “AnotherKind” is therefore a hybrid art form: it is an online archive containing the documentation of various creative pursuits inspired by the original play. During the Zoom performance of “AnotherKind,” Wilson takes the audience through the archive, highlighting certain items and commenting throughout via live typing. The audience is free to visit the entire archive after the show at their leisure (https://anotherkind.nationalartsfestival.co.za/).

“Another Kind of Dying” tells the story of Silumko, a young man from the Eastern Cape who moves to Johannesburg after his father’s death. Here he uncovers the circumstances which lead to his father’s death, confronts his sexuality and imagines a different kind of life for himself. In “AnotherKind” the environment and context of the story is created through soundscapes make by Foley, singing, and percussion as well as fragments of the script which are rehearsed and performed. Aphiwe Livi, who performs the role of Silumko, builds Silumko’s world in miniature with clothes pegs and string. Videos and soundbites document these process and are available on the online archive.

A number of these documentations stand out, not only because of what they document, but also the way in which they document the creative process. The prologue, “the tuning,” for example, is a video of the chorus singing. They are also covering themselves in clay. The video is rendered in sepia and blurs into slight double vision from time to time. This emphasizes the idea of instability as the chorus appears to either mold themselves into their roles, or escaping a clay mold.

For me the most touching scene is “My Father Arrived in a Box.” Video of Livi, in a moving box, is placed in front of a background animation of a hand shuffling slips of paper with the words “my father,” “body,” “arrived in a box,” and “a sunrise.” The visuals therefore mimic the grief process of trying to come to terms with a traumatic event and how this is reflected in language. The loaded words themselves are scrutinized and repeated until they revealing nothing more of the complexity and ramifications of the event itself.

“Documents,” on the other hand, pulls the audience into the frustration of the scene. The video showing Silumko and his family navigating through the sheaf of documents needed for an accident claim is covered by digital documents that have to be removed by the audience member. This immerses the audience while not compromising the narrative.

“AnotherKind” therefore makes use of innovative digital techniques to tell the story of “Another Kind of Dying.” Simultaneously, through the Zoom performance, the production also comments on our current frustration during the pandemic. It is inspiring to experience how the creative team of “AnotherKind” is adaptable enough to find an alternative creative outlet in a time when people feel increasingly lonely and terrified.

NAF 2021: “Île.”

By: Sophie Joans
With: Sophie Joans
Directed by: Richard White
16 July 2021, 19:00
Online: Zoom

The pandemic and its resulting lockdowns (varying in degree) is after several months (I’ve lost count) still with us and still limiting venue based theatre. The discussion surrounding online theatre has evolved and some regard the digital/physical hybrid form of theatre we’ve seen in the last few months, as something that would have happened eventually, regardless of the pandemic. Nevertheless, in South Africa the transition to online theatre has in many instances been awkward. While the KKNK and the NAF should be commended for moving all or some of their 2021 festival content online, and thereby providing artists with the opportunity to create work (and audiences with the opportunity to experience and support theatre), not all of these ventures have been equally successful. For this reason I have decided to break my write-about-every-performance-you-see rule. Some of the online theatre productions I’ve seen at NAF and beyond will not be discussed on this blog, either because they fit more into the genre of parlour game than theatre (and it would therefore be unreasonable to judge them as theatre), or because I feel it would be unfair to be critical of a production when its flaws could very well be due to the awkwardness of a livestreamed theatre stage.

“Île,” written and performed by Sophie Joans, is one of the productions that works in an online medium. It is the coming of age story of Sophie, a young woman of Mauritian descent, who travels to the island for a gap year and subsequently comes to terms with her heritage. The play is presented via Zoom and Joans faces the screen directly as she performs this monologue. This creates the impression that she is telling her story to you alone. The performance therefore draws the viewer in, unlike poorly filmed stage productions which distances the viewer. The other audience members, visible at the top of the screen, could be a distraction, but to me it acknowledged the theatre/not-theatre ontology of the play.

The success of the production is, however, mostly due to Joans’ skill in storytelling (she is also a comedian, not incidentally). She brings an impressive amount of energy to her performance, which keeps the play engaging. Joans also makes effective use of the limited range of motion available to her by sometimes moving close to the camera when voicing a different character, or, for example, mimicking the movement of the booger dangling from another character’s nose. As a result the characters that Sophie encounters come to life and the story becomes textured and often very funny. Limited lighting effects were also used quite successfully. In one scene a candle is used as a single light source which creates suspense. The sudden blackout when the candle is blown out as well as the sudden switching on of electric lights support the transition of scenes and helps to maintain the tempo of the play.

The result is a relatable tale, told by a likable character, illustrating the complexities of mother-daughter relationships, family politics, religion, heritage and coming of age as a young woman in world that is still patriarchal.

“Dear Ireland: Parts I-IV.”

By: Carmel Winters, Enda Walsh, Iseult Golden, Sarah Hanly, John Connors, Shane O’Reilly, Nancy Harris, Owen McCafferty, Frank McGuinness, Felispeaks, Gina Moxley, Abbie Spallen, Michael West, Shaun Dunne, Manchán Magan, Eva O’Connor, Edna O’Brien, Aoife Martyn, Arthur Riordan, Andrea Molino, John O’Donovan, Deirdre Kinahan, Zoe Ní Riordáin, Karen Cogan, Jimmy Murphy, Rani Sarma, Zhu Yi, Pam Boyd, Stacey Gregg, TKB, Sinéad Burke, Dermot Bolger, Dylan Coburn Gray, Meadhbh McHugh, Colm Keegan, Phillip McMahon, Darach Mac Con Iomaire, Sonya Kelly, Margaret Perry, Joseph O’Connor, Kit de Waal, Ciara Elizabeth Smyth, Keith James Walker, Mark O’Halloran, Una McKevitt, Blindboy, Emmet Kirwan, Rosaleen McDonagh, David Ireland, Jody O’Neill.
With: Lucianne McEnvoy, Zara Devlin, Marion O’Dwyer, Denise Gough, Graham Early, Amanda Coogan, Morty Rea, Patrick O’Kane, Joan Sheehy, Deirdre Molloy, Timmy Creed, Jolene O’Hara, Marc Doherty, Eva-Jane Gaffney, Bríd Criomhthain, Amy McAllister, Stanley Townsend, Norma Sheahan, Rory Nolan, David Moss, Nicola Coughlan, Bríd Ní Neachtain, Seána Kerslake, Seána Kerslake, Clare Dunne, Owen McDonnell, Julia Gu, Brendan Gleeson, Conor MacNeill, Ericka Roe, Eleanor Walsh, Dawn Bradfield, Leah Minto, Clare O’Malley, Owen Roe, Caoilfhionn Dunne, Eoin Ó Dubhghaill, Deirdre Donnelly, Breffni Holahan, Kathy Rose O’Brien, Peter Gowan, Camille Lucy Ross, Ashleigh Dorrell, Andrew Bennett, Katherine Lynch, Cathy Belton, Emmet Kirwan, Sorcha Fox, Abigail McGibbon, Marie Mullen.
28 April – 1 May 2020, 19:30
Abbey Theatre, Dublin.
Online: https://www.youtube.com/user/AbbeyTheatre

20200501_202945(0)

The view of Dear Ireland from my desk.

Theatre, by definition, depends on a gathering. You could do away with all other aspects of the genre, such as the building, set, sound, and lighting: as long as there is an actor performing a script to an audience in a communal space, you would still have theatre. Since the Covid-19 pandemic has made the sharing of a communal space taboo, theatre is one of the industries that was compelled to close its doors. Unsurprisingly, actors and theatre makers are anxious to find a way to work. In a piece on Medium, theatre artist and writer, Nicholas Berger, laments the flood of “content” on theatre companies’ and actors’ social media pages. Berger finds posts of archival material and readings by actors irrelevant to our times and self-indulgent; he deems slap dash “quarantine play scripts” desperate. As dedicated as I am to the communal experience of theatre, after watching the 50 online “theatrical postcards” in the Abbey Theatre’s four part Dear Ireland series, I have to disagree with Berger.

Obviously, watching Dear Ireland online does not feel the same as seeing a play in the Abbey. I also do not think that online performance is the future of theatre. However, Dear Ireland manages to provide its audience with four nights of entertainment that articulates the tangled mess we’re in. Some artists steer into the skid by making the awkward medium part of the narrative, while others approach the project as a short film, with varying success.

Generally, I preferred the monologues that incorporate the medium into the story, as Michael West’s “Gorse” does. In this monologue, Marc Doherty portrays a bored, somewhat disillusioned academic who struggles to present his lectures online. Through his ignorance of technology and his uncertainty about when he is on camera, he inadvertently reveals his innermost thoughts to his students (and, by implication, the audience). This was also the main premise in Darach Mac Con Iomaire’s “End Meeting?” in which a young and somewhat conceited actor, Dan ‘The Flan Man’ Flannery (Eoin O’Dubhghaill) botches a zoom-audition. Where “End Meeting?” is funny, allowing the audience to experience a bit of schadenfreude, “Gorse” has a more somber tone since its protagonist indulges in nostalgia as control over his own life slips.

While Una McKevitt’s hilarious “Let’s unpack that shall we,” followed a similar structural approach, with a psychologist (Katherine Lynch) offering online therapy to pets, the technologically challenged party in this case was her client, Tony, a troubled Pug. Some monologues portray the day to day realities of lockdown, such as Carmel Winters’ “Staying Alive” in which Lucianne McEnvoy portrays a woman on a Skype call with a friend, while self-isolating from her family in a tent inside her house. Also “Grace,” by Joseph O’Connor shows the audience the lockdown video diary of a married woman (Kathy Rose O’Brien) with children. There are difficult days and days filled with anxiety, but importantly, there are also days filled with hope and love.

Some of the productions that made use of filmic techniques were visually appealing and are excellent short films in their own right. These include Owen McCafferty’s “Home,” featuring Patrick O’Kane and Jimmy Murphy’s “The Meadow,” with Clare Dunne. Both these pieces combine a voice-over with footage of natural scenery. In “Home,” the character tries to keep thoughts of an ill loved one at bay by reciting his shopping list in his head while walking on the beach. In “The Meadow,” the voice-over narrates how the character finds herself at her late grandmother’s cottage for lockdown. Through planting potatoes in ridges last used before the famine, she discovers that her bond with the past is strengthened. “The Golden and the Gray,” by Margaret Perry shows the same performer (Breffni Holahan) portraying different characters in different experiences of lockdown and isolation. Each mini-monologue is filmed in a different style and this eclectic combination creates an interesting viewing experience emphasizing how the pandemic affects people in different ways. Also “The Temple is Closed,” a metareferential comedy written and performed by Emmit Kirwan, makes effective use of sophisticated editing to convey the disorienting existential panic that the empty streets of Temple Bar induce.

Unfortunately, in the case of Dermot Bolger’s “A Hand full of Jacks,” featuring Dawn Bradfield, an over-utilization of filmic devices and editing detract from a beautiful script and fine performance. The images accompanying the voice-over monologue illustrate the narrative too literally, rendering kitsch what would have been touching and relatable. This monologue could benefit from an approach where the performer simply addresses the audience through an unacknowledged camera.

This approach is followed by quite a few artists. Enda Walsh’s “Walk,” is delivered in a simple but effective way, showing only Zara Devlin’s face and shoulders as she performs a poetic description of a solitary walk. Also Felispeaks’ “To Éire,” a poem mining Ireland’s past for a passionate warning and call for hope, is performed by Deirdre Molloy in one shot while sitting on a bed, facing the camera.

There are performers that address the unacknowledged camera in character and some of these performances are the highlights of the series. Mark O’Haloran’s “Joe,” performed by Andrew Bennett, gives voice to a man who is at risk for becoming seriously ill from Covid-19 on account of his age. He is completely isolated as a result. The man describes how he passes his days: by taking his little terrier for walks and drinking in the evening, although it is “drinking of a different order with no pubs involved.” The monologue reveals Joe’s path to self-awareness as he realizes that he had been bitter and cut off from society even before the pandemic. Joe resolves: “if I survive this, I’ll make an effort to rejoin life, whatever that means.” Joe’s vulnerability is superbly conveyed by Bennett, making this piece a showcase of outstanding acting.

My absolute favourite monologue of this series, David Ireland’s “The Good Thief,” also had its performer, Abigail McGibbon, face an unacknowledged camera. The script expertly balances sympathy with humour in this story about an unlikely connection between a woman and an asthmatic burglar with Covid-19 symptoms, entangled with the complex relationship she has with her highly religious mother. McGibbon shows comic genius in her deadpan delivery of this bizarre tale.

Numerous other monologues also address the complexity of human relationships with the pandemic on the background. “An impossible woman,” by Iseult Golden shows the audience a video recorded by a very successful and influential gender equality lawyer. This video is meant for her daughter, who refuses to speak to her after an argument about parenting. O’Dwyer creates a believable character within seconds and draws the audience into the narrative. I could not help but sympathize with the character, despite her supposed “impossible” streak. The coronavirus is referred to coincidentally and forms to backdrop to a different human drama, emphasizing how peoples’ lives continue despite the drastic changes that the pandemic brought.

Keith James Walker’s futuristic “Flake,” likewise presents an alternative experience of crises, suggesting that even while living through an enormous global disaster such as this pandemic, people’s direct emotional experience is often of more importance to them. The protagonist in this piece, portrayed by Ashleigh Dorrell, is asked what it was like to have lived in Ireland in the 2020s and while she cursorily refers to major global events, such as the US blowing up the Arctic, public displays of intimacy being banned, and cars exploding from the heat of global warming, she spends much more time talking about a brief love affair she had with a woman named Allison.

In Colm Keegan’s “Something Worth Saying,” a man (Owen Roe) in isolation tries to come up with an appropriate message for his unborn grandchild. Through his self-conscious attempts at profound wisdom, his love for his daughter – with whom he recently had an argument – shines through. The gravity of the outside reality is emphasized in subtle ways, such as a supposedly discarded false start where the character is interrupted by a violent coughing fit.

Sonya Kelly’s “A letter to the manager,” emphasizes the importance of coincidental human contact. Mary (Deirdre Donnelly) writes a letter to the manager of a supermarket, complaining that the teller at till no. 3 was replaced by an auto teller. No. 3’s teller, Padraig, had been an immense support to her in the year after her husband died through their little chats each time he rang up her shopping. Shane O’Reilly addresses this theme in a different way in “Windowpane,” in which the performer (Amanda Coogan) interrupts her cleaning of a window to convey the details of her day to day life during lockdown in sign language, supposedly to a neighbour. At the end, just before she is about to divulge gossip, she stops herself and continues cleaning her window, emphasizing the need for kindness during the pandemic.

Both Sarah Hanly’s “Shower” and Aoife Martyn’s “Night 4” give voice to nurses, who has been widely considered to be on the front line of the fight against Covid-19. “Shower” – which is definitely one of the best written and performed pieces of Dear Ireland – a nurse (Denise Gough) sits inside her broken shower, on the phone with a plumber. On this day, which was already emotionally taxing, she is unable to enjoy the small comforts of a shower and a cup of tea due to faulty plumbing. During their phone conversation, she starts to bond with the plumber, highlighting the solidarity which can form between people in times of crisis. “Night 4” gives a completely different perspective on the experience of nurses, as its protagonist, masterfully portrayed by Norma Sheahan, is cynical and resents being hailed a hero for simply doing her job. Through dark humour, but without ever losing sight of how serious the situation is, the protagonist’s humanity is underscored.

As can be expected, the theme of loss is also prevalent. Stacey Gregg’s “Staring at the Sun,” which is not set against a coronavirus backdrop, narrates how a man (Conor MacNeill) has to rely on the metaphysical to work through his grief after his mother’s passing. “These Four Walls,” by Sinéad Burke, shows a teacher (Eleanor Walsh) packing up her classroom, mourning the time she is losing with the children in her class. John O’Donovan’s “Your Hands,” performed by Nicola Coughlan, depict a situation many couples currently find themselves in: of having to postpone their wedding due to the coronavirus. Not only is the couple stranded at the protagonist’s in-laws, but they are also separated from each other, as one of them developed Covid-19 symptoms. The character conveys this as she speaks to herself while applying her wedding make-up. The ritual of applying make-up underscores her attempt to capture some elements of the day that they lost. Shaun Dunne’s “The Box Room,” also addresses the theme of loss, as the protagonist (Eva-Jane Gaffney) considers the value she places on her work and potential to earn income. This is now taken away from her where she is in isolation with her family.

Conversely, the experience of coping with the pandemic when far away from family also finds expression in a few monologues. In “West,” by Rami Sarma, the father of a young child is far away from his home town. He receives the news that his beloved grandfather died of Covid-19 and is unsure about how he will break this news to his child the next morning. Owen McDonnell’s portrayal of vulnerability was poignant. Also “Dear Ireland (an unreliable ex-lover suddenly writes)” by Nancy Harris shows the character (Marty Rea) far away from his home country. Self-isolation has given him the space to reflect on his mixed feelings about Ireland and he does so in the form of a love letter to the country. Rea’s performance was engaging, delivering this quirky text with charm.

In Meadhbh McHugh’s “A New Yorker now?” the character (Clare O’Malley) is originally from Ireland but has been living in New York for seven years. At the start of her monologue she seems more concerned about cementing her status as New Yorker by staying in the city during the pandemic. At first she is calm but as she becomes aware of the severity of the situation through messages from Ireland, she panics. The monologue emphasizes her conflicted feelings about her immigrant status: on the one hand she desperately wants to blend in with her new surroundings, but on the other she hankers back to Ireland when she starts to feel unsafe. This is very effectively illustrated by her accent shifting between American and Irish. Also Zhu Yi’s “I know you” illustrates the metaphorical split in identity caused by emigration when the US-based protagonist (Julia Gu) receives a phone call from the version of herself who remained in China, warning her not to go to a frat party, but to rather take the coronavirus seriously. 

Also the effect of the pandemic on people’s mental health is a recurring theme in this series. Arthur Riordan’s “The Other Side,” suggests that many people’s anxiety is churning beneath a calm appearance. The protagonist is reading an e-mail that he drafted a week ago. The e-mail is now ridiculously outdated, emphasizing how quickly things changes in the absurd context we find ourselves in. The character persists in attempting to convey the harrowing circumstances of the pandemic in an upbeat, diplomatic way, but these scenes are interrupted by scenes where he expresses his panic and anxiety in a spoken word poem. John Connors’ “Dear Ireland I’m fucking riddled with anxiety” likewise shows a man (Graham Early) expressing the distressing experience of not having access to his usual coping mechanisms during the pandemic.

Eva O’Connor’s “Maxwell House,” on the other hand, addresses this theme in a comic way in a tale about unrequited love. Amy McAllister portrays a character in love with her roommate, who decides to spend lockdown with her boyfriend. The protagonist, feeling rejected, kidnaps her roommate’s cat in an attempt to lure her back. The audience only has access to the protagonist’s side of the story, but as she is an unreliable narrator, it is easy to imagine the events from her roommate’s point of view. Also Ciara Elizabeth Smyth’s “Party party” puts a comic spin on people’s attempts to resolve their trauma. The character in this monologue (Camille Lucy Ross) pretends to celebrate her childhood friend, Breege’s, 36th birthday with her. A Barbie doll stands in for Breege as the protagonist dialogues with her and works through the psychological damage that resulted from their friendship.

Things get even more absurd with Blindboy’s “Stone Mad from the Flavour of the World,” in which a woman’s (Cathy Belton) internal monologue is heard. Her thinking becomes paranoid as she watches a Spaniel sitting at a bus stop, waiting. She repeats the question, “what want has a dog for a bus stop?” as her speculations on the dog’s motivation becomes more bizarre. She also recounts an unfounded theory (supposedly confirmed by a doctor who works at the Mater) that a person’s pronunciation of the word “coronavirus” influences whether or not that person becomes sick, citing Michael D. Higgins’ pronunciation as safe. In both “Party party” and “Stone Mad from the Flavour of the World,” the behaviour of the characters – how bizarre they may be – feels familiar. Both dramatists explore the strange behaviour people engage in when left to their own devices for too long.

The experience of lockdown in domestic set-ups diverging from the nuclear middle class family, is also a popular theme in “Dear Ireland.” In “Wiper at Work” by Abbie Spallen, a server (Jolene O’Hara) hides in a storage room as her abusive father enters her place of work. She reflects on how the lockdown has trapped her mother with him. The character repeatedly returns to the statistic that Covid-19 seems to be more fatal for men than for women. The protagonist in Karen Cogan’s “Katy Barry’s” runs a pub which is also a safe house and recounts the different ways that the inhabitants of the safe house handle lockdown. Siobhán Cogan performed this storytelling role expertly, making all the different characters come to life. This monologue emphasizes the importance of chosen families, a vital safety net for many, during the pandemic. Also Phillip McMahon’s “The Rock,” featuring Caoilfhionn Dunne, underscores the need for societal support for the LGBT community in a narrative centering on a lesbian’s reservations about getting married to the love of her life and mother of her unborn child. Although marriage equality is an essential step in the fight for equality, it does not eradicate the deep seated homophobia in the community.

A number of monologues also address xenophobia and classism within Ireland. Deirdre Kinahan’s “Dear Alex,” narrates the experience of a woman (Bríd Ní Neachtain) who befriends a refugee from Albania and worries about the impact of Covid-19 on immigrant communities. In Zoe ní Riordaín’s “It’s all the same” Seána Kerslake voices an experience of the pandemic from the viewpoint of a social outcast, while Dylan Coburn Gray’s “What we never got to lose,” featuring Leah Minto, reflects on adoption rights. TKB’s “Tara’s Hill,” show the audience a homeless woman’s (Ericka Roe) vlog, describing how her life in a government funded hotel has not changed much since the lockdown. Roe’s performance juxtaposes questions about the dignity and rights of the homeless with a charming send-up of YouTube culture. Also in Rosaleen McDonagh’s “Dear Ireland you will hardly notice my absence” Sorcha Fox portrays a woman from the Travelling community, lamenting the lack of dignity with which she is treated in a government funded hotel.

Pam Boyd’s “After this Thing,” explores Ireland’s housing crisis from the perspective of a capitalist developer (Brendan Gleeson). This character responds to a letter of complaint about a new development that will destroy a number of trees and historical buildings. The capitalist is depicted in a grotesque way, yielding to no-one in his steam roller approach, regarding the pandemic as just a minor hiccup, delaying him temporarily.

While Ireland’s social problems are therefore indicted in various monologues, Kit de Waal’s “The Three Irishmen” is more optimistic about the country’s potential for social change. Peter Gowan portrays the role of a conservative Irishman who struggled at first to come to terms with various societal changes, such as the ban on smoking in pubs and the legalization of same sex marriage and abortion. However, through his relationship with his liberal daughter and mixed race grandson, this man comes to accept a new Ireland. However, Jody O’Neill’s “Conversations with …” suggests that for some, social change has come too late. An older woman, portrayed by the brilliant Marie Mullen, is puzzled by the country’s sudden concern for her when it treated her generation so cruelly before. She asks, “Dear Ireland, where were you when I needed you?,” referring to the time she was forced to give up her baby for adoption when she fell pregnant at fifteen. A monologue such as this, where a charge of cruelty is brought to a country with the added tragedy of the damage being irreparable, can easily lapse into melodrama. However, Mullen’s sensitivity to the nuances of victimhood made this piece another highlight of the series.

Frank McGuinness’ “Pints of Milk” and Gina Moxley’s “A Start,” looks to Ireland’s past for a way to make sense of the present. In “Pints of Milk,” the character (Joan Sheehy) recounts an anecdote about her aunt who got fired for sewing a shirt for her neighbours’ boy after her shift at the factory where she worked. After this, she resolved to forego the luxury of milk in her tea. The piece reminds the audience that Ireland has lived through hardship before, and must find the resilience to overcome also this disaster, in one way or another. The monologue ends with an ambiguous non-religious blessing and sprinkling of milk, asking the earth to sustain/survive us. “A Start,” on the other hand, contemplates the duplicity of the beautiful landscape in county Kerry, where its metareferential character, Timmy Creed, finds himself for lockdown. Creed considers how the famine roads in the area came about and wonders what physical changes the current crisis will leave on the landscape. He reflects also on how the breathtaking landscape shows no signs of distress: for those of us who are healthy and not working in the healthcare sector, the pandemic plays out in our minds and the media, not in the environment that surrounds us.

Edna O’Brien’s letter, “Dear Ireland,” read by Stanley Townsend, advises on the importance of literature in times of distress and details how the author finds inspiration from the work and life of W.B. Yeats. O’Brien finds Yeats’ work especially relevant to the times we are living in, reflecting that “poetry, like prayer, answers to some deep and grainy loneliness within us, especially when we are cut off from others.” While O’Brien turns to literature for inspiration, Manchán Magan turns to the Irish language in, “Poll mór/Big hole,” a meditation on words, performed by Bríd Criomhthain. By reciting the various different words for “hole” in Irish, the way language is moulded by circumstance becomes clear. The monologue deems Irish to be mostly concerned with “earthy, rooted, thingy things,” articulating how a way of life which has become foreign to most shaped this language. At present, the pandemic forces us to return to the “earthy, rooted, thingy things” as life as we know it has changed forever.

“I want the things” by Andrea Molino, featuring David Moss, is also a meditation on language, reminiscent of Derrida. The performer uses percussion and voice boxing to reflect on the gap between words and things. Language is merely “labels that stick on the things, they are not the things.” But, insufficient as language may be, it is also indispensable. Consequently, we use language to form our own version of reality.

In a similar way, the arts is indispensable in making sense of and shaping human experience. Throughout all fifty monologues in Dear Ireland, the single characteristic that stood out was emotional economy; a resolve to be strong and keep it together. This gives new meaning to the protagonist’s description of the function of her cosmetic setting spray in “Your Hands”: “keeps it all from falling apart.” There might be an undercurrent whirling and spluttering away with anxiety, but all we can do in these circumstances is to stay at home and calmly wash our hands fifty times a day.

Theatre might not be able to articulate this reality to us in the traditional way just yet, but online theatre is a way to reach audiences during the time of lockdown to expose them to work that tries to make sense of our current reality. As such, it is legitimate and necessary. I think of online theatre as a rat pack to sustain us until we are able to feast on the real thing again.

View at Medium.com

View at Medium.com

AARDKLOP 2019: “halfSES vir SESuur.”

Met: Stephanie Maria Gericke, Llandi Beeslaar, Magdaleen Groenewald
Stelontwerp, teks & regie: Llandi Beeslaar
Verhoogbestuur: Llandi Beeslaar, Magdaleen Groenewald
27 September 2019, 12:00
ATKV Aardklop Atrium B POK

Waarskuwing: Intrigebederwers!

Soos verlede jaar met “Toutjies en Ferreira,” was my laaste Aardklopvertoning ‘n metadramatiese komedie. Ek reken dis ‘n baie goeie noot om op af te sluit. Die vertoning begin wanneer die voorportaalpersoneel die gehoor inlig dat die venue geskuif het, en hulle dan kwansuis na ‘n ander lokaal in die gebou neem, wat in hierdie geval die galery van die POK-saal was. Die ruimte is beknop, en daar is net-net genoeg plek vir al die gehoorlede om in te skuif om ‘n tafel. Die verhoogbestuurder, Maggie (Magdaleen Groenewald), stap dan in en vra die tegniese span om die beligting vir die repetisie aan te skakel. Die speler, Stephanie (Stephanie Maria Gericke), en regisseur, Llandi (Llandi Beeslaar), kom in, en begin dan verskeie monoloë repeteer.

Alles loop egter verkeerd: Stephanie het vergeet om ‘n bra aan te trek en haar kostuum is vuil, sy kan van die monoloë se woorde nie onthou nie, daar word gewerk aan die gebou en Aardkloppersoneel waarsku die span dat daar geraas mag wees. Maggie versteur telkens die repetisie deur te sukkel om die deur oop te maak, in die gebou self te adverteer, of die rekwisiete buite die speelarea te spuitverf.

Die arme Stephanie loop deur onder die kritiek soos sy met elke liewe monoloog iets verkeerd doen. Wanneer sy, as ‘n vrou wat vir die eerste maal smaak ontdek, heeltemal te entoesiasties aan ‘n peer smul en betig word (“Jy kan nie dit voor ‘n gehoor doen nie. Ek’s ernstig”), kom Maggie met die onbehulpsame voorstel dat Stephanie dalk aan iets minder morsigs, soos ‘n wortel, of water, moet proe. Eindelik is die kritiek te veel vir Stephanie en sy weier om die rol te speel. Die vertoning moet noodgedwonge gekanselleer word.

“HalfSES vir SESuur” is egter meer as bloot ‘n comedy of errors. Die stuk beeld uit hoe moeilik dit is om ‘n teaterproduksie op die planke te bring. Dit lig ook sekere aspekte van teater uit, soos die weerloosheid van ‘n speler. Dit is per slot van sake tog sy, en nie die regisseur of tegniese span, wat voor die gehoor moet verskyn. Dit is ook duidelik hoe afhanklik die verskillende rolspelers van mekaar is, en hoe belangrik dit is om ‘n verhoogbestuurder te hê wat prakties is en ‘n goeie intuïsie het, vir die stuk in besonder, maar ook in die algemeen.

My enigste kritiek is dat daar omtrent drie of vier kaartjies te veel verkoop is. Om so naby aan die spelers te sit, sorg vir baie van die spanning van die produksie, en ek dink die paar mense wat nie om die tafel ingepas het nie en agter my moes sit, het bietjie uitgemis.

AARDKLOP 2019: “Wilde-als.”

Deur: Wessel Pretorius
Met: Dawid Minnaar, Jana Cilliers
Regie: Wessel Pretorius
Verhoog- en produksiebestuur: Natassja Jooste
Vervaardiger: Aardklop en KKNK
Ondersteun deur: KunsStig
26 September 2019, 20:00
kykNET Gimmies

“Wilde-als” is ‘n pragtige stuk; heeltemal in ‘n ander rat as iets soos “Koningin Lear,” en ook nie so uitdagend vir die gehoor nie, maar geensins oppervlakkige vermaak nie.

“Wilde-als” is ‘n karaktergedrewe drama wat die verhaal vertel van Hilde Kraus (Jana Cilliers), ‘n skrywer in haar sestigs, wat haarself afsonder om haar laaste, outobiografiese boek te skryf. Paul Naudé (Dawid Minnaar), haar mentor, muse en eertydse minnaar kom help om te sif tussen deur haar drafts en herinneringe, en só word Hilde gekonfronteer met pynlike sleutelgebeure in haar verlede.

Die stuk volg ‘n tipe A Star is Born-narratief, maar sonder die dramatiese einde, en speel dertig jaar nadat die karakters mekaar ontmoet het af. Hoewel Hilde meer talentvol as die alkohol-verslaafde Paul blyk te wees, bly sy afhanklik van sy goedkeuring en mentorskap. “Wilde-als” is dus ‘n toneelstuk oor hoe mense hul metaforiese afdruk op mekaar laat (in Breyten Breytenbach se woorde). In hierdie geval is die karakters op ‘n tragiese manier ineengestrengel. Terselftertyd is “Wilde-als” ook ‘n stuk oor die spanning tussen feit, herinnering en fiksie, wat – onder andere – op ‘n pragtige manier uitgebeeld word wanneer Hilde en Paul ‘n aand uit hul verlede herskep en ‘n gekreukelde tafeldoek en wit kerse die eertydse kitsch-deftige restaurant voorstel. Wessel Pretorius slaag dus  hier baie goed daarin om ‘n teks te skep wat speelbaar én gelaagd is.

Verder is dit ook bloot ‘n plesier om hierdie twee spelers saam op die verhoog te sien. Hulle het ‘n goeie rapport en vanuit die staanspoor is dit duidelik dat die twee karakters ‘n komplekse verlede deel. Jana Cilliers kombineer trots en ‘n realistiese aardsheid in haar uitbeelding van Hilde. Die karakter is ongenaakbaar wreed teenoor haarself, maar selfs in haar mees patetiese oomblikke is daar ‘n waardigheid aan haar. Dawid Minnaar se Paul is besorgd, maar afsydig; onpeilbaar en misterieus. Die indrukwekkende teenwoordigheid van albei spelers vul die pouses en sodoende word baie meer as bloot dialoog aan die gehoor oorgedra.

My Aardklop sou beslis baie armer gewees het sonder hierdie besonderse kombinasie van teks en spelers.

AARDKLOP 2019: “Boks.”

Deur: Philip Rademeyer
Met: Stephanie Maria Gericke
Stelontwerp en regie: Llandi Beeslaar
Verhoogbestuur: Llandi Beeslaar en Magdaleen Groenewald
26 September 2019, 16:00
ATKV Aardklop Atrium B POK

“Boks” herinner aan intieme teater, ‘n tipe teater waar die gehoorlid sentraal staan tot die vertoning, volgens Daniel Schulze (2017: 67). In hierdie geval word ‘n maksimum van sestien gehoorlede na ‘n vierkant van wit materiaal gelei. Daar is 4 splete aan elke kant van die vierkant waardeur die gehoorlede hul koppe steek. Die vertoning vind dan binne hierdie vierkant – of boks – plaas.

Volgens wat Llandi Beeslaar, die regisseur, voor die vertoning aan die gehoor sê, het die produksiespan verskeie skrywers genader om ‘n stuk vir “Boks” te skryf, met die beperkinge dat dit binne hierdie ruimte moet plaasvind en slegs een speler benodig. Hierdie was my eerste “Boks”-ervaring, en Philip Rademeyer se teks het ‘n postapokaliptiese scenario geskets waar slegs ‘n vrou en ‘n klip oorgebly het na ‘n ekologiese massaverwoesting.

Die vrou besin oor die einde van beskawing, eensaamheid, die laaste oomblikke voor die vernietinging, toe die “rooi en die oranje” die “groen en die blou” verswelg het. Die spel was goed, veral as ‘n mens in gedagte hou dat die gehoor die aktrise bekyk asof sy ‘n dier in ‘n dieretuin is.

Ek voel wel dat die teks nie genoeg gedoen het om die konsep van “Boks” te ontgin nie. Dit is ‘n vreemde ervaring om na ‘n opvoering te kyk terwyl verskeie ontliggaamde koppe die speelarea omring. Ek sou graag wou sien dat hierdie ontliggaamde koppe deel uitgemaak het van die produksie. Tog was die “Boks”-ervaring interessant genoeg dat ek dit beslis weer sal bywoon.

Bronne:

Schulze, Daniel. 2017. Authenticity in contemporary theatre and performance: Make it real. London: Bloomsbury.

AARDKLOP 2019: “Koningin Lear.”

Deur: Tom Lanoye (vertaal deur Antje Krog)
Met: Antoinette Kellermann, Anna-Mart van der Merwe, André Roothman, Rolanda Marais, Neels van Jaarsveld, Wilhelm van der Walt, Edwin van der Walt, Matthew Stuurman,
Regie en stelontwerp: Marthinus Basson
Kostuumontwerp: Elaine du Plessis
Klankontwerp: Rynhardt van Blerk
Oudiovisuele ontwerp: Dawid Joubert
Verhoogbestuur en beligtingsontwerp: Nicolaas de Jong
Vervaardiger: KKNK
Ondersteun deur: NATi en die Vlaamse Fonds voor de Letteren
25 September 2019, 14:30
Beeld Ouditorium

20191001_133448.jpg

Die Aardklopprogram beskryf “Koningin Lear” as ‘n “seldsame meesterstuk,” en ek kan nie aan ‘n beter beskrywing dink vir hierdie asemrowende produksie nie. Elke aspek van hierdie opvoering was professioneel en afgerond. Die produk is ‘n teaterervaring op ‘n standaard wat ongelukkig die uitsondering eerder as die reël is binne die raap-en-skraap feeskonteks.

Tom Lanoye, Antje Krog en Marthinus Basson is ‘n goeie kombinasie. Dit was reeds duidelik met “Mamma Medea” in 2002. Lanoye, Krog en Basson is aldrie onverskrokke in hoe hulle omgaan met moeilike en steurende onderwerpe. Die verhaal van Elizabeth Lear (Antoinette Kellermann), die suksesvolle sakevrou wie se liggaam en gees afgetakel word terwyl haar twee oudste seuns slegs in hul eie kapitalistiese belang optree, word dus sonder enige sentimentaliteit uitgebeeld.

Die uitbeelding van gierige kapitaliste wie se ambisie nie gestuit word te midde van politieke en ekologiese chaos sowel as die matriarg wie se koue, ongenaakbare persona stelselmatig deur demensie vernietig word, is ‘n raak transponering van die gegewe van Shakespeare se teks na die hedendaagse konteks. Waar die versteurde weerpatrone in King Lear ‘n reaksie is op die wanbalans in Lear se koninkryk, is dit in Koningin Lear eerder die gevolg van mense soos Elizabeth se uitbuiting van die aarde se hulpbronne vir materiële gewin.

Die styl waarin die stuk opgevoer is herinner net genoeg aan ‘n melodramatiese sepie om die spot te dryf met die karakters se ongebreidelde gierigheid. Die onnosele oudste seun, Hannes (Neels van Jaarsveld) en sy “dobberende krismisboom” van ‘n vrou, Somien (Anna-Mart van der Merwe) skep met hul uitspattige kostuums ook ‘n visuele kontras met die soberder, middelste broer, Hendrik (Wilhelm van der Walt) en sy pragtige, stylvolle, maar sieklike vrou, Alma (Rolanda Marais). Anna-Mart van der Merwe se vermoë om komiese rolle meestelik te vertolk is weereens ontgin. Die feit dat ‘n hawelose junkie (Edwin van der Walt) wat Elizabeth en haar verpleër in hul swerwinge teëkom deur dieselfde akteur as haar jongste seun, Corné, vertolk word is ook ‘n goeie gebruik van die konvensies van die teater, aangesien die gehoor saam met Elizabeth onseker is of hierdie man werklik haar kind is.

Die vertoning was ook ‘n meesterklas in ensemblespel, want hierdie belaglike figure vorm die agtergrond waarteen Antoinette Kellermann ‘n fyn balanstoertjie tussen weerloosheid en gekunsteldheid uitvoer. Soos dit ‘n veteraanaktrise betaam, is sy vreesloos in die ontbloting van haar liggaam en siel, soos Elizabeth toenemend kontak met die werklikheid verloor.

Basson se ontwerp van eenvoudige panele en platforms wat verskeie ruimtes voorstel was esteties treffend en funksioneel. Bo die agterste panele is ‘n ry monitors wat óf die plek waar ‘n bepaalde toneel afspeel voorstel, óf die heersende chaos in die wêreld se weerpatrone en politiek. Dit sorg vir ‘n rusteloosheid in die agtergrond tydens die tonele waar die karakters in die storm ronddwaal.

Die stuk het my ook laat nadink oor voete en skoene. Basson is lief daarvoor om sy aktrises in hoëhakskoene te laat speel, en die vroulike lede van die Lear-familie was ook aanvanklik almal in stilettos. Camille Paglia (2017) beskryf die stiletto as ambivalent – dit is gelyktydig ‘n gevaarlike wapen, en ‘n pynbank. Dit sorg vir ‘n indrukwekkende, gesofistikeerde beeld, maar dit is ook inhiberend, vanweë die ongemak wat dit veroorsaak. En dit is presies hoe die Lear-vroue in hierdie produksie daaruit sien: skynbaar onaantasbaar, maar onder die oppervlak weerloos en gepynig. Elizabeth se agteruitgang word dan ook juis deur haar kostuum gesuggereer. Die stylvolle uitrustings wat sy in die eerste twee tonele dra, maak plek vir nagklere, en later slegs ‘n onderrok. Dit is ook dan wat mens haar kaal, weerlose voete opmerk, in skrille kontras met Somien en Alma wat steeds in hul hakskoene rondloop.

“Koningin Lear” is drie ure van verwondering oor wat op ‘n verhoog kan uitgerig word.

Bronne:

Paglia, Camille. 2017. Free Women Free Men: Sex, Gender, Feminism. New York: Pantheon.

AARDKLOP 2019: “RAAK.”

Met: David Viviers, Anoëcha Kruger
Teks, stelontwerp & regie: Kanya Viljoen
Verhoogbestuur: Wicus Louw
Vervaardiger: Kanya Viljoen
Ondersteun deur: KunsStig
25 September 2019, 10:00
Girls High

WAARSKUWING: INTRIGEBEDERWERS!

20190925_100249

Hierdie stuk, wat handel oor ‘n paartjie wat op hoërskool ontmoet en trou, maar wie se verhouding nie ‘n toksiese manlikheidskultuur kan oorleef nie, stel ongelukkig teleur.

Jana (Anoëcha Kruger) en André (David Viviers) is aanvanklik baie verlief, maar soos dit moeiliker raak om binne die perke van die patriargale plaasgemeenskap te bly, begin André eers net vir Jana emosioneel afknou, haar later rondstamp, en eindelik verkrag.  Die teks pak egter vir my te veel aan vir ‘n produksie van 60 minute. Hoewel verkragting, die onvermoë om ‘n miskraam/onvrugbaarheid te verwerk, ouers se verwagtinge dat hul seun moet boer, jag en gesinsgeweld alles herlei kan word na die impak van patriargie, is hier eenvoudig te veel ingrypende dinge wat met die karakters gebeur. Dit veroorsaak dat gegewe wat ‘n groot emosionele impak behoort te hê melodramaties word.

Ofskoon albei spelers potensiaal toon, was daar van die begin van die stuk af geen spanning tussen die karakters nie. Daar was ook nie genoeg variasie in die spel om die meer dramatiese momente uit te lig nie. Dit het veroorsaak dat die stuk bloot aangekarring het en dat dinge soos André se geweldadigheid ongemotiveerd voorgekom het. Die tonele wat terugflitse na hul hoërskooljare wys, is ook gespeel asof die karakters kinders, eerder as tieners is. Ek vermoed die regisseur wou die onskuld van die karakters in hierdie tonele beklemtoon, maar tieners se illusie dat hulle “cool” is, is dikwels die grootste teken van onskuld.

“RAAK” was miskien bloot te ambisieus. ‘n Teks wat meer alledaagse gebeure op ‘n deegliker manier ondersoek het sou waarskynlik vir ‘n interessanter produksie gesorg het.

 

AARDKLOP 2019: “Katvoet.”

Deur: Tennessee Williams (verwerk deur Nico Scheepers)
Met: Marius Weyers, Marion Holm, Tinarie van Wyk Loots, Laudo Liebenberg, Albert Pretorius, Martelize Kolver, Geon Nel, Mia Dippenaar, Inge Dippenaar, Nina Dippenaar
Regie: Nico Scheepers
Stelontwerp: Nico Scheepers en Patrick Curtis
Beligtingsontwerp: Michael Garbett
Kostuumontwerp: Rouvé Hattingh
Verhoogbestuur: Jeanne Steenkamp
Vervaardiger: US Woordfees
‘n NATi/Feesteforum-produksie
24 September 2019, 15:30
Beeld Ouditorium

WAARSKUWING: INTRIGEBEDERWERS!

20190925_135422.jpg

Dit is altyd opwindend om ‘n goeie produksie van ‘n teks soos Tennessee Williams se Cat on a Hot Tin Roof op ‘n Afrikaanse verhoog te sien. Die teks bied ongelooflike geleenthede aan goeie akteurs, en elke lid van die geselskap het in hierdie geval beïndruk. In hierdie weergawe speel die gegewe af op ‘n wildsplaas in Limpopo, op die aand van Pappie se 65ste verjaarsdagpartytjie. Pappie (Marius Weyers), Moeks (Marion Holm), hul seuns Buffel (Albert Pretorius) en Boela (Laudo Liebenberg), dié se vroue, Yollie (Martelize Kolver) en Maggie (Tinarie van Wyk Loots), Buffel en Yollie se kroos (Mia, Inge, en Nina Dippenaar), asook die dominee (Geon Nel) is bymekaar vir hierdie geleentheid. Die plot word gedryf deur twee onthullings: die rede waarom Boela hom aan drank oorgee (wat Pappie uit hom uit trek), en Pappie se terminale kankerdiagnose. Aangesien Boela en Maggie nie kinders het nie, probeer Buffel en Yollie om hul posisie as die enigste erfgename uit Pappie se testament te verseker.

Tinarie van Wyk Loots spog met haar veelsydigheid in haar vertolking van Maggie. Hoewel haar interpretasie hulde bring aan Elizabeth Taylor s’n in die filmweergawe van hierdie teks, is Loots volledig in beheer van Maggie die kat en haar onweerstaanbare magnetisme. In ‘n pragtige, vloeiende smaraggroen rok word ‘n mens se oog deurgaans na haar toe getrek, selfs in die tonele waar sy in die agtergrond staan en rook. Loots hou die desperate en trotse aspekte van Maggie se karakter in ewewig, wat maak dat ‘n mens simpatie met haar karakter behou.

Die toneel waar Boela aan Pappie erken waarom hy drink, het my hoendervleis gegee. Dit is ‘n lang toneel met verskeie skuiwe in die magsverhouding tussen die twee karakters. Pappie moet aanhou karring aan Boela totdat dié stukkie vir stukkie die implikasies van sy hegte vriendskap met die oorlede Casper onthul. Boela gaan egter verder deur ook te onthul dat Pappie terminaal siek is. Marius Weyers en Laudo Liebenberg het die spanning in hierdie lang toneel deurgaans met vaardigheid behou. Weyers se Pappie is ‘n arrogante patriarg wat sy vrou afknou, maar ook opreg besorg is oor sy seun se drankprobleem. Sy reaksie op die nuus van sy diagnose – om te skreeu en sy verjaarsdagkoek te vermorsel – gee sy weerloosheid op ‘n tragiese, maar onsentimentele manier weer. Hoewel Laudo Liebenberg miskien by die gimnasium moes aansluit om Maggie se bewondering vir sy lyf te regverdig, het hy absoluut oortuig as ‘n tragiese held wat geen sin meer in die lewe vind nie.

Met hierdie drie tragiese karakters op die voorgrond, skep Marion Holm, Martelize Kolver, Albert Pretorius en Geon Nel ‘n histeriese kontras op die agtergrond met die karakters van Moeks, Yollie, Buffel en die dominee. Hierdie karakters is amper karikatuuragtig, maar o, so herkenbaar. Die humor wat uit hul karakters spruit bied gepaste komiese verligting. Die resultaat is ‘n stuk wat die gehoor deurgaans vermaak, maar ook raak. Ek moet vir Marion Holm uitsonder in haar uitbeelding van die luiddrutige, aanmatigende Moeks met haar onvanpaste grappies, maar wie se vernedering ook tasbaar is wanneer Pappie haar afknou. Yollie en Buffel se vrugbaarheid en naakte gierigheid skep op sy beurt ‘n skerp teenpool vir die dominee se ongemaklike, onbeholpe pogings om in hierdie sosiale opset in te pas.

Die stel is ‘n voorstelling van een van die spaarkamers in die plaashuis. Die meubels is outyds maar smaakvol, met net genoeg visuele verwysings na wild om die gehoor te herinner dat die gebeure op ‘n wildsplaas afspeel. Die neutrale kleurpalet van die dekor en meeste van die kostuums vorm ‘n pragtige kontras met Maggie se groen rok. Die spieëltafel waar Maggie met haar rug na die gehoor sit, terwyl haar gesig steeds sigbaar is, skep ook interessante blokmoontlikhede. Die stel bied verskeie speelareas rondom die hoofspeelarea, sodat ‘n mens bewus bly van die gebeure en karakters wat om die sentrale konfrontasies in die stuk afspeel.

Die teks se vertaling na Afrikaans het vlot en natuurlik geklink, maar die transponering van die gegewe het wel ‘n paar probleme opgelewer. Die eerste hiervan is die tydperk waarbinne die stuk afspeel. Te oordeel aan die dekor en kostuums, speel die stuk iewers in die tweede helfte van die 20ste eeu af, wat vir my gepas sou wees. Die arrogansie van die wit patriarg en die marginalisering van die huishulp en plaaswerkers sou ook sin maak in die 1960s, 1970s, en die 1980s. Wanneer Yollie en Buffel se kinders egter met selfone en oorfone inkom, en Yollie hulle afneem op ‘n tablet, kom dit as steurende anachronismes voor. Daar is te veel gegewe wat net geloofwaardig sou wees tot en met die tagtigerjare. Waarom, byvoorbeeld, konfronteer Yollie nie vir Maggie oor haar rokery en die glasie sjampanje wat sy vroeër gedrink het nie wanneer Maggie voorgee dat sy swanger is? Die gemak waarmee Maggie in haar skoonouers se huis rook hoewel nie Pappie of Moeks blyk te rook nie, is ook ongewoon vandag. Ons leef steeds in ‘n samelewing waar homofobie algemeen is, maar die manier hoe Boela dit as ‘n absolute taboe onderwerp beskou, dateer ook uit vroeër tye.

Dan is daar verskeie verwysings na die “vrugbaarste grond suid van die Limpopo.” Waarom sou ‘n mens sulke vrugbare grond vir ‘n wildsplaas gebruik eerder as om gewasse daar te verbou? Laastens word daar na die dominee as “dopperdominee” verwys. As iemand wie se van Krüger is, kan ek met gesag sê dat ‘n doppergemeente nie ‘n ikoniese afbeelding van “die Liewe Vader” in hul kergebou sal aanbring nie en dat dopperdominees ook nie heeltyd “amen” sê nie.

Die uitstekende spel en visuele trefkrag van die stuk is gelukkig nie oorskadu deur hierdie probleme nie, en “Katvoet” bly een van my Aardklop-hoogtepunte. Dit was ‘n voorreg om Williams se pragtige teks in die hande van so ‘n bekwame geselskap te sien.